|
Current Issue Contents | Past Issues | Subscribe | Contact | Terasem Journals Home |
||
|
Volume 2, Issue 3
|
Why Transbemans in Biostasis are AliveDr. Martine RothblattPage 5 of 5 In the final analysis, death is the irreversible end to beingness. There is no objective answer to whether or not beingness has forever ended. Death is a subjective state, How might we accommodate, in society, in law, and in practice, treating death as subjective? I would propose that The requirements for certification would be that the biostasis firm has some kind of a perpetual funding dedicated to reversibility so we keep that notion of reversibility alive and intact, and that will help us bring the legal and medical community back in saying we are dedicated to reversibility. A research program that is focused on revival, again paying homage to the reversibility and compliance with what might be called good biostasis practices. If anybody reads cryonics or any of the journals there are good and bad biostasis processes. Bad biostasis process is you throw the person in the icebox. Good biostasis process is you comply with all sorts of protocols to minimize any kind of damage done during the cool down in biostasis process.
A good acronym might be NDOBR, National Death Opt-Out via One of the consequences of opting-out of death via NDOBR is that the death certificate could be replaced with a biostasis certificate providing legal documentation that shows this individual has moved from one stage of life to another. There would be no longer any automatic dissolution of marriage by death, but that wouldn't stop anybody from going to a court and asking for the marriage to be dissolved, it just doesn’t happen automatically by being dead. You could still go into a court and dissolve your marriage.
A trustee would make decisions for a biostasee. The trustee process could be part of the certification of the biostasis providers or it could be something that the individual arranged for on their own. Legally, the result would be very much the same as if the biostasee were in a coma. Going into a coma does not automatically end any of your citizenship rights or your property rights. Your inability to make a decision means that a trustee of some sort has to make them for you.
Transbemans in biostasis are alive for two separate reasons. First, they reasonably The law will change; as it follows, it does not lead. The law will change to recognize them as living once plaintiffs succeed in showing that biostasis does not equal death and NDOBR is legislated or accepted by courts. Finally, a reversible biostasis with seemingly constant identity is shown, the individual appears on Oprah, and everybody is absolutely persuaded that death is reversible and, therefore, death is subjective. Bio
|
The Terasem Pledge We pledge allegiance to the flag of the collective consciousness of Terasem, and to the principles for which it stands, education, persistently, with diversity, unity, and joyful immortality everywhere.
|
|
TerasemJournal.com Home | Journal of Geoethical Nanotechnology | Journal of Personal Cyberconsciousness Copyright © 2006-07, Terasem Movement, Inc. Disclaimer |
||
the objective indicia of which can be generally agreed upon in law and culture. Transbemans in biostasis are alive because they intend to reverse that biostasis. Biostasis still captures their beingness and they have reasonable reasons to believe that they can be reversed. 
we allow individuals to, by contract, opt-out of legal death by a new process of certified biostasis, and that we create a National Opt-Out Registry that certifies biostasis programs such as cryonics firms and beme storage firms. 
Image 11: Death as Subjective 
in individual states because the determination of death is left up to each state. 
Image 12: Opting Out 
Image 13: Conclusions 
intend their status to be reversible and their identity to be constant. Second, legal death is not the same thing as real death. 
Martine Rothblatt, J.D., MBA, Ph.D.